The primary records behind this recall — county emails, the Planning & Zoning file, the KPERS correspondence and the Sheriff’s report — published in full so you can check them against what we say about them.
These are the documents. Not our summaries of them — the records themselves, as the county produced them, so you can read the whole thing and decide whether we have described them fairly.
The county’s complete file on the zoning complaint, and the emails around it. These are the documents behind “Inappropriate as Hell”.
The county’s own case record, printed from its code-enforcement system on August 21, 2026 in answer to an open records request. Violation: “Zoning Violation.” Complaint: “Operating a business out of a home.” Filed anonymously. The parcel is zoned “RR” Rural Residential. Ten months after it opened, the status still reads “Pending,” with no permit application and no completion date.
Read the documentCommissioner Stanton’s home address is covered. Nothing else is.
Photographed into the county’s case file. He posted it himself, before any complaint was made, and it tells the public the business is moving to the restoration workshop and that they can visit by appointment.
Her account of what happened when two Planning & Zoning employees telephoned a sitting commissioner as a courtesy instead of mailing the certified letter.
A county employee’s name is covered. She did not make the complaint, and she asked not to be taken for the person who did. The Administrator’s mobile number is covered. Nothing else is.
Seventy-two minutes after she wrote to the Board, this was his entire answer to her. She forwarded it to all five commissioners sixteen minutes later without comment. He never said what in her account was wrong.
As above: one employee name and the Administrator’s mobile number.
The letter itself. It asks him to abate the violation by applying for a conditional use permit within twenty days — and tells him that if he thinks the decision is wrong, he may appeal it to the Board of Zoning Appeals on the same twenty-day clock. He did neither.
His home address is covered in the mailing block. The legal description of the property is left as written — it is the operative text of the letter.
She wrote again the next day, and this one is not about Commissioner Stanton at all. It is about what the week had done to the people who work for the county.
The employee’s name and the detail that would identify her locally are covered, at our discretion and not at the county’s request. Every word about what happened to her is left as written.
Under the heading “We’ve Relocated!” — three weeks before his attorney told the county he had not relocated.
His attorney’s answer. It argues he is pursuing a permitted home occupation and needs no permit — and it closes by telling the county what defending a lawsuit would cost its taxpayers, and suggesting the whole thing is driven by “personal animus” inside the Administrator’s office.
Published in full and unredacted, including the argument that he was entitled to do what he was doing. Read it and judge it yourself.
Ten months later Commissioner Stanton emailed the publisher of the Leader & Times telling him what to ask the county for — including the notes taken by the two employees who had called him. The publisher’s request went in four days later.
Read the documentTwo personal email addresses are covered. County addresses are left as written.
The correspondence behind the recall petition itself. These are the documents discussed on The Record and dated in the chronology.
The opening correspondence: a sitting commissioner contacting the state retirement system directly about a county employee’s benefits, without the Board’s authorisation, from a private email account.
Read the documentA second county employee’s name and identifying details are covered throughout. He was found to have correctly earned his benefits, and he is entitled to the privacy Mr. Standard was not given.
How the agency handled the challenge internally once it had been made.
Read the documentIncluding the request that the determination letter be copied openly to county Human Resources while his own copy went by blind copy.
Read the documentThe agency’s own record of a call about the matter.
Read the documentThe exchange in which KPERS’ counsel writes that the review ran on the document Commissioner Stanton sent, and that it was one the County Administrator had never seen before.
Read the documentThe second employee’s name and identifying details are covered.
Her own notes as the matter unfolded: the unauthorised contact with KPERS, the request that the Sheriff file criminal charges, the July 29 meeting at which he would not say where his list of KP&F employees came from, and KPERS’ eventual confirmation that the benefits were properly earned.
Read the documentTranscribed verbatim; wording unchanged. Two clearly-labelled side notes were added for context and are marked as not part of the original.
Mr. Standard’s own account of thirty-seven years of work, written for the Kansas Public Employees Retirement System. At the foot of page three, in his own hand, the Sheriff of Seward County writes that it is “consistent with my recollection of Greg Standards service to Seward County as a first responder,” and signs and dates it. Ten weeks earlier Commissioner Stanton had told the same agency that it was “the opinion of our rural fire chief and county sheriff” that neither man was eligible for KP&F.
Read the documentPublished whole and unaltered, at Mr. Standard’s request and with his permission. The Sheriff attested that the ACCOUNT OF THE SERVICE matched his recollection; he did not write a ruling on pension law, and nothing here should be read as one. The date Mr. Standard typed at the head of his statement does not exist on a calendar; it is his own slip and the page is reproduced exactly as he wrote it.
A deputy was called to the County Commission meeting after Commissioner Stanton pointed his finger in Commissioner Persephoni Fuller’s face as she left executive session. Stanton acknowledged to Sheriff Ward that he told her to “watch your mouth” while holding his finger up at the level of her face, and the Sheriff told him he could not speak to her that way. She asked that no charges be filed. Page 3 is an unprompted email from the County’s IT Director to the Sheriff the next day saying he saw it happen.
Read the documentDate of birth, driver’s licence number and home address are covered. Every name, and the whole account of Commissioner Stanton’s conduct, is left as written.
This page grows as records arrive. Outstanding requests include the KPERS determination letter and the county’s written authorisation, if one exists, for a commissioner to act on the county’s behalf with the retirement system. If you believe a document here is incomplete or has been described unfairly, tell us and we will publish the correction.
The short version is on The Record. The long version, with every date in order, is on the chronology.